Ets: Past the Point of No Return: Or is it?

November 9, 2009

past

The stage is set. The players find their places. The curtain is about to rise on the final parliamentary fortnight of the year.

In thinking about these final moments of the 2009 parliamentary year, I’m continually compelled to think of Phantom of the Opera.

Kevin Rudd is playing the Phantom of the Political Opera with Malcolm playing the opposing female protagonist.

It seems all to appropriate that the CPRS-ETS debate should be couched in these terms as we lurch closer to the final vote on a measure that will define the economic makeup of Australia for the next 50-100 years. Crippling or re-defining a generation in its wake.

As de-facto Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce lurches all over the country side proclaiming his flat-earth denialism to the dwindling band of constituents that will listen, you have to wonder whether this issue is finally going to be put to bed in this last week of the parliamentary year or whether it will be decided at an early 2010 Federal poll.

Then you have Prime Minister Rudd bashing on about how the Coalition denialist approach is dangerous and risks the future of the planet.

When will this ludicrous debate finally be over! Some have indicated that Rudd’s approach will continue well into 2010/12.

But the truth is this issue even if the debate ends in 2010/11 isn’t going away to be replaced with more mundane matters, like restoration of the Finances after horrendous attacks from Kevin and Swannie “The economically conservative Leaders”.

The problem is this “Climate-Change, Global Warming, Co2 pollution, polar ice caps and polar bears with sunshade’s and dhakery’s on a beach image isn’t going away at all!

In the final analysis of history. Will the historians judge both Australia and the world’s response to Co2 pollution as nothing more than a politically motivated fudge-fest aimed at increasing the size of Government to the detriment of both the environment and the economy?

Time will tell I suppose, but I remain convinced that  “Talking isn’t acting” Politicians seem especially good at the talking bit but not good at acting.

The scariest part of all of this is the fact that the current situation of bank-bailouts and the return to protectionism is feeding into and setting up a situation where a large-scale ETS-CPRS could easily be superimposed upon Governments, to the detriment of Free-market development and approaches to the issue that would be more moral and rational.

Rupert Murdoch though not specifically speaking to the Climate issue in the video below was and remains right. Keeping open markets functioning and removing the lascivious effect of protectionism will not only be key to scaling our way out of the current crisis but also assist and instruct our response to the Climate issue in the marketplace.

Though, there’s no love in the phantom’s song to Malcolm and the Coalition. Its almost definitely safe to say that the ETS: has reached the point of no return.

Whether it passes or not, the future of solutions will remain heavily dependent on the freemarket and capitalism to find and distribute the technical and economic answers.

Till then, feast upon the music of the night, and pray that this Climate debate doesn’t end in a protectionist stalemate!


Pithy Post of the Week

November 7, 2009

The MOLEEE!!!!! LOL.


Cultural Amnesia

October 29, 2009

No this is not a book review about Clive James’ latest literary work.

It’s come to my attention that the current generation of X, Y and Generation Millenium or Noughties as they have been described have lurched into the 21st Century in a state of Cultural Amnesia.

The heady birth of modern youth culture found its screaming beginning on 15 August 1969 in a sleepy hamlet known as White Lake in the town of Bethel, New York, USA. Or to the initiated Woodstock!

Woodstock, that historical and musical landmark event. The rudimentary forunner of MTV.

This mixture of youthful exuberence, Social unrest over civil rights and Vietnam, free love and free drugs seemed to be the beginning of a new world of experience. However all of this actually came at a heavier price than first thought.

Despite the fact that the proliferation of drugs created and perpetuated a youth culture image that previously had no clear articulation this was it! This was the pinnacle, or so the previous generation tells us. The obsession with Woodstock, the Beatles and the Beach Boys creates a situation where you are inclined to think yes it is good music, but it is turning into a historical archive that points to the trajectory of the music of the current time tracing the twists and turns of the current generation. The beauty of hindsight perhaps.

Woodstock embodied every social, sexual, economic and rebellious element of a younger generation rising up against the perceieved oppression and societal norms of the previous generation of 49ers and beyond.

Just as the younger generation derided the hypocrisy and ludicriosity of conservative norms of 1969 and attempted to supplant their own vision of a new utopian society of peace, love and brotherhood, so to was the current cultural amnesia being supplanted by that very rebellion.

The immediate problem that confronts economic and social conservatives is the instinct that this was just an excuse to get drunk, get high and propagate nothing more than carnal desires.

I would argue that there was more to this than that. Despite the fact that this generation has dominated the cultural landscape ever since, the truth is its influence over the current generation is waning but still leaving what I would describe as Kirk Cobain styled Cultural Amnesia in its place.

The reason for this cultural amnesia is clear. The baby-boomer generation of the Beatles, The Beach Boys and Woodstock, have sucked so much oxygen out of the cultural landscape that their collective memories whether directly connected or not to the woodstock generational change is directly linked to the idea that their’s was the greatest and most original generation since as the current crop of “schoolies” would say “Like, eva!”.

The truth is, as the aging Baby-boomers of both the “hippy and non-hippy” mind set begin retiring from their lives as corporate climbers and begin facing the reality and inevitibility of death, the ultimate result is the surge in sales of 4WD’s and Caravans.

For you see the previous generation is taking one last existential look at the wider world from the caravan window, before old age, bad health and senility take its inevitable hold.

The Beach Boy’s generation is almost dead or at the very least beginning to look so outdated that a new generation is needed to shake up the cultural landscape in music, art and culture so as to create the next generation’s sense of cultural amnesia.

The question then becomes how will the current generation of muscicians, artists and writers re-create the watershed moment embodied by a woodstock type event without being howled down by decrepid and aged hipsters whose only aim in life is to re-iterate “Nothing compares to our music MAN!”  It is this re-iteration that makes me believe cultural amnesia exists to some extent in the current generation!

The idea of a millienial Woodstock event, totally different from the myth and legend created by the 1969 version would be the way to go.

Perhaps an appropriate title would be i-stock 2.0. The ultimate online event that would create a historical landmark for i-pod downloads and provide a new platform for established acts and new talent to supplant a cultural memory that will supercede  the woodstock generation.

Perhaps our generation’s Beatles, Beach Boy’s and Woodstock are embodied by

Goldfrapp

Wolfmother and

The Black-eyed peas

At the end of the day if the current generation is going to succeed in selfishly sucking all of the cultural juice out of future generations and create a cultural monolith that makes the next generation feel inadaquate, I’ve got a feeling that there’s allot of work to be done. Especially if this effort is aimed at  over-whelming the smug and aging hippies who seem content to re-invest themselves in the rudimentary myths that started us down this path in the first place.

Perhaps, I’m wrong, but on the other hand, I’m sick of hearing how great the Beatles, Beach Boys and Woodstock were in the landscape of the past.

This tiresomeness often translates itself to my own feeling of unconcluded Amnesia. Hopefully it is a feeling that will pass along with the memory of the Hippies of Woodstock and the corporatism that it gave birth to.

Tim Humphries is a Brisbane based cultural hobbit and is interested in history both from the social, political and cultural perspective.


The Road Ahead: After the 2010 Defeat

October 10, 2009

Though preempting the result of next years election, I believe I can say without much fear of contradiction, that when ever the election is called, the Liberal Party are going to be royally slashed and burnt. 

Or to put it more succinctly “slayed” by the Rudd Government and its domination of the news cycle, the polls and the general sentiment of the press gallery.

Unless there is a seismic shift in public sentiment, the Liberal Party are not on its current Leadership going to dent the Rudd Government with the same Debt and Deficit messaging that was used in 1996 to such great effect.

1996, was a different time and place. I remember it well, it was a time when Paul J Keating the great Beelzebub of Australian politics, was running around with his political correctness, Republican and Flag talk, and the stench of a long and failed slog through the peaks and trough’s of political and economic fortune.

A generation of Australian’s had suffered long and hard through the scaring war that was the last recession.

The Labor debt had reached 96 Billion and there was obviously an air of change in the wind with the refreshed, safe, respectable and conservative visage of John Howard on the political horizon.

Putting aside argument on the failures and successes of his policy and economics, Howard was a man reborn.

The reason I diverge into this corridor of distant memory, is the fact that I was very disappointed that at the age of 16, I didn’t get a chance to vote for Howard for the first time.

This in itself was a solid argument for lowering the voting age to encourage civic participation in the younger Generation. That as well as allowing me an opportunity to baseball bat Keating over the head with my ballot paper. But I digress.

It was truly a great time to be a conservative! The torch of freedom had been relit by Howard and his men and the convergence of freedom forces had finally been given a chance to make their mark on the history and polity of Australia. [To which retiring MP Peter Costello is owed much of the credit]

Again though time and place  moved on. I remember well in 1998 after casting my first ballot for the fresh faced Mal Brough Liberal MP in the Federal seat of Longman, the atmosphere seemed to have changed dramatically.

The Hanson saga with its broad psychological and political implications, raised its ugly head and was buried just as quickly. To say that Hansonism was primarily a reflection of racism and/or Howard’s political ambivalence to aforesaid intolerance widely misses the point.

I acknowledge that there was an unsavoury racist element to it that had to be fought and was indeed fought successfully. 

However it was also a time when the psychology of the people could best be described as “still traumatized” by the incessant political correctness of the Keating years and the Internationalism and Globalization talk that was being used as an excuse to cover for the corporatisation, downsizing and casualization of  the traditional working and middle class employment market.

This hence left a sour taste in the mouth of those on the receiving end. 

Keating represented and trumpeted this message and though at some level correct from a Free-market, Free Trade perspective, the psychological impact on this core constituency resulted in Howard’s enduring “Battler” cohort success.

It was this same old constituency and the new Generation constituency that moved to Kevin Rudd in 2007.

The people had grown tired of the strong Leadership and stewardship of Australia that reflects the ebbs and flows of cyclical change in Australian politics and felt comfortable enough with Rudd to give him a go.

Options for the Future

  • Brendan Nelson – deposed leader

 Brendan Nelson’s failed leadership, highlights the fact that Opposition really is a tough business and that someone has to carry the can for the party after a long successful stint in Government.

Brendan carried himself with dignity and grace throughout his time in the leadership and I was pleased to have had the opportunity to meet him in person at an ALSF function in 2008, just before the current leader took over.

 Brendan Nelson reflects the sort of mixture of professionalism and ordinariness that does appeal to the real Australia that exists outside of the confined insiderness of the halls of power in Canberra.

Had he stayed on, if political fortune had not been so one-sided towards Rudd, I believe Brendan Nelson would have again had an opportunity to serve as a senior Minister in the next conservative Government.

  • Malcolm Turnbull

The current leader Malcolm Turnbull is a mixture of brilliance and political ineptitude. His similarity to Victorian John Elliott in regard to his business success is striking and leads one to imagine what Mr. Elliott might have achieved if he had been granted an opportunity to step onto the floor of the Federal Parliament in the same way that Mr. Turnbull did.

The primary problems for Turnbull are the following:

  • His status as one of Australia’s richest politicians i.e. Hand’s Labor a free kick re: class warfare/silvertail.
  • His involvement in the Republican Referendum Debate in 1999 – remains as sticking point with the majority of the conservative movement.
  • His connections to the Australian Labor Party and the possibility that he may have stood for the ALP in the past b4 joining the Liberal Party.
  • His left leaning attitudes on a lot of core conservative issues, that put him at odds with the primary conservative base of the party.
  • The sense that he transmits a phoniness in how he communicates his political message.
  • A general sense of volatility and uncertainty on where he stands on some issues.

Malcolm’s primary problem is what a friend of mine described as the Private School bully boy mentality. His success in business and life though wide-ranging, required a certain level of bully boy tactics for that success to be achieved.

 This is reflected in his recent commentary on the issue of climate change and his ambivalence to “anonymous smartasses” in the party who were expressing concerns regarding his handling of the climate change issue.

It’s this public volatility that turns off voters and leads to the conclusion that the incumbents will prevail at the 2010 election.

The other irony of the Turnbull leadership is the fact that he is in lock-step with the Rudd Government on climate change, but has not been able to harness the necessary support to take amendments from the party room to the Government to reach a consensus position.

It’s for this reason, that I do feel sorry for Mr. Turnbull. If the party does not come together and back his strategy on climate change at the forthcoming party meeting next sunday, the headlines regarding his Leadership in terminal decline will continue to its logical conclusion.

With a majority of the party room in the sceptical camp on climate change and the National Party absolutely ruling out their vote and suggestions on amendments, the next few months will remain an interesting time, for this Leader in what appears to be his declining days.

If he doesn’t survive politically, the You tube epithet shall read “Malcolm Turnbull – In the Ghetto”.

 

I’m strongly of the view that he should have remained in either the Shadow Treasurer or Shadow Finance portfolio. However that is the nature of politics and the power of personalities at play.

From a political perspective it was the obvious move that played to his key strengths. But again with the power of his personality, the Leadership quest would never be far off from re-surfacing. So perhaps his impending demise will be a positive thing that allows the party to move forward with a real conservative leader.  

  • Tony Abbott

Without Costello in the mix, Tony Abbott remains the one authentic conservative voice that could potentially be the leader either before or after the next election.

His strong religious background, means that core conservative issues are a no-brainer. You know unequivocally where he stands and his reputation as a head kicker is renowned in itself.

I was initially cautious about discussing Abbott as a future Leader of the Liberal Party, because his Catholicism is obviously something that plays a major role in his politics and I was concerned that religious dogmatism may dominate his leadership style.

The big plus on the intellectual side is his staunch qualifications on IR, Support for the Constitution under the current arrangements and a sense that despite his idiosyncratic nature, he would be a safer conservative pair of hands both on the social and fiscal issues.

I personally think, he will be one to watch in the coming months after the climate change issue is put to bed.

  • Joe Hockey

Joe again is another kettle of fish altogether. He spars Rudd well, has name recognition re: Sunrise, communicates well but has had difficulties in cutting through on some of the big ticket policy items that fit within his and the broader policy portfolio.

He is strong on the fundraising front and would be interesting to watch as a moderate Liberal that does not fit into the traditional conservative mould.

Conclusion

Overall there are still options for the Liberal Party, however with next years election shaping up as a Climate Change election rather than election on the Economy, The party does need to get its act together if it is to begin cutting through, out here in voter land.

Here’s hoping that we do and don’t have to play the political-strategic long game for the next decade.


Liberty Poetry – A Mega Post

October 5, 2009
‘An Experience’
By T.W. Humphries
Dashing fence posts whip past my eyes,
A magnificent river quietly stirs,
With the ebb of a flowing breeze.
Such an experience it is just to gaze,
The stirring river and changing seasons, all an experience.
Human beauty is an experience, one I continually recall.
Lost in the landscape of this runaway train,
Sunlight darts in a shimmer past me.
Transfixed by the panorama below, the sensation consumes me.
Gaunt and rugged mountains in contrast to motionless grassy plains,
Are dwarfed by a rock laden bridge and thunder struck tracks.
I turn, reality bites, and I realise an experience is an experience.
The gliding scenery changes and the sensation switches key.
Rust clad trucks rumble to their destinations,
No one knows were they’re heading, but what an experience.
The droning engines pulse as the red gates fall,
And the towering locomotive hammers past.
The throbbing heart of a handsome suitor swoons in the field,
He has an experience to tell.
His crushed heart, against the hands of a woman, of experience.
He has witnessed the wonderment of her eyes,
And the flash of her sweet breath against his heart.
What must he do to win her over,
Then the truth sets itself, he kicks himself and watches the fading train.
An old man, sits bewildered, his eyes a darting confusion,
His large rimmed spectacles cannot fathom society.
He remembers simpler times, when experience was earned with experience,
Not by books or culture, but by long days spent in the endless sun.
Yet the man realises that the university of life has escaped him,
He is obsolete in many peoples eyes,
But within himself he is content to be what he is, A worker.
Then a school girl, who clutching her books, wonders aimlessly,
To her, life is but an endless game, a pool of hapless chatter.
Her experience is clasping to the dream of maturity,
Passionately she dreams of living happily ever after,
Then she looks down at her undeveloped body and wishes to be older, with experience.
Three men stand quiet in an unassuming group,
Each man wears the cap of his own experience.
One is short, fat and another is tall and lanky.
They are escapee’s of a mental institution and gesticulate profusely.
These men have volumes of experiences, within their minds,
They brilliant at maths and physics,
No one judges their capacity, for they are capable men.
The eloquent pages of a book dance before a student,
He is swept into a fantasy with welcoming eyes and an open spirit.
Knowledge and wisdom are to him a fact of life,
Experience follows with analysing these delusional segments of life.
A questioning mind awakens and still he thinks of experience.
Pondering the subtle messages of that hallowed binding,
The student notes enlightenment and casts the page, for the next and so on….
A dark glassed woman, sits with suspicious autonomy,
Her demeanour is rigid and she tolerates nothing,
Shiny tightly laced boots are reinforced by a depressed and languid attitude,
Neat colours of black portray a defiance that no one can or dares to trace.
A ornate necklace hangs limp against this woman’s chest,
Memories of the past surface and the necklace reveals all.
Yet her long hair deceives me, it is a man!
A young boy scribbles on a blank page,
His life is marked by the verse of repetition.
And the age old cliche ‘I must remember not to be late’,
This is an experience reflecting marvellous days of mischief.
Climbing trees and gazing out at endless afternoons.
The fading landscape reminds me of an experience,
I had it when wondering what to do with myself.
Depression, insomnia and internal thoughts of dread,
Pressed hard against my tired, unexperienced head.
Yet all of this was an experience, catching a glimpse of people’s lives,
The speeding train falters and is consumed by a stormy guise.
The unknown, the future, a sensation is this an overpowering experience?
The luxury of time tells me more interesting things are on their way.

‘Experience’

By T.W. Humphries

Dashing fence posts whip past my eyes,

A magnificent river quietly stirs,

With the ebb of a flowing breeze.

Such an experience it is just to gaze,

The stirring river and changing seasons, all an experience.

Human beauty is an experience, one I continually recall.

Lost in the landscape of this runaway train,

Sunlight darts in a shimmer past me.

Transfixed by the panorama below, the sensation consumes me.

Gaunt and rugged mountains in contrast to motionless grassy plains,

Are dwarfed by a rock laden bridge and thunder struck tracks.

I turn, reality bites, and I realise an experience is an experience.

The gliding scenery changes and the sensation switches key.

Rust clad trucks rumble to their destinations,

No one knows were they’re heading, but what an experience.

The droning engines pulse as the red gates fall,

And the towering locomotive hammers past.

The throbbing heart of a handsome suitor swoons in the field,

He has an experience to tell.

His crushed heart, against the hands of a woman, of experience.

He has witnessed the wonderment of her eyes,

And the flash of her sweet breath against his heart.

What must he do to win her over,

Then the truth sets itself, he kicks himself and watches the fading train.

An old man, sits bewildered, his eyes a darting confusion,

His large rimmed spectacles cannot fathom society.

He remembers simpler times, when experience was earned with experience,

Not by books or culture, but by long days spent in the endless sun.

Yet the man realises that the university of life has escaped him,

He is obsolete in many peoples eyes,

But within himself he is content to be what he is, A worker.

Then a school girl, who clutching her books, wonders aimlessly,

To her, life is but an endless game, a pool of hapless chatter.

Her experience is clasping to the dream of maturity,

Passionately she dreams of living happily ever after,

Then she looks down at her undeveloped body and wishes to be older, with experience.

Three men stand quiet in an unassuming group,

Each man wears the cap of his own experience.

One is short, fat and another is tall and lanky.

They are escapee’s of a mental institution and gesticulate profusely.

These men have volumes of experiences, within their minds,

They brilliant at maths and physics,

No one judges their capacity, for they are capable men.

The eloquent pages of a book dance before a student,

He is swept into a fantasy with welcoming eyes and an open spirit.

Knowledge and wisdom are to him a fact of life,

Experience follows with analysing these delusional segments of life.

A questioning mind awakens and still he thinks of experience.

Pondering the subtle messages of that hallowed binding,

The student notes enlightenment and casts the page, for the next and so on….

A dark glassed woman, sits with suspicious autonomy,

Her demeanour is rigid and she tolerates nothing,

Shiny tightly laced boots are reinforced by a depressed and languid attitude,

Neat colours of black portray a defiance that no one can or dares to trace.

A ornate necklace hangs limp against this woman’s chest,

Memories of the past surface and the necklace reveals all.

Yet her long hair deceives me, it is a man!

A young boy scribbles on a blank page,

His life is marked by the verse of repetition.

And the age old cliche ‘I must remember not to be late’,

This is an experience reflecting marvellous days of mischief.

Climbing trees and gazing out at endless afternoons.

The fading landscape reminds me of an experience,

I had it when wondering what to do with myself.

Depression, insomnia and internal thoughts of dread,

Pressed hard against my tired, unexperienced head.

Yet all of this was an experience, catching a glimpse of people’s lives,

The speeding train falters and is consumed by a stormy guise.

The unknown, the future, a sensation is this an overpowering experience?

The luxury of time tells me more interesting things are on their way.

‘Morn’

By T.W. Humphries

The dismal sound of thrashing, collides on a window,

Laughter of darkness, plagues the moaning light.

Rain and thunder roll at the narrow roof tops too,

The joy of early morning, set against the sparkling dew.

The smell of spring rings so clear and the sun begins to rise,

Tender puffs of white lashed cloud, shifting in the sky.

Yet as the glorious break of day shines, mountains rise so stark,

The growling rustle of winter wind, distanced by the lark.

Wonder of all great wonders, the blue sky meets the horizon,

Sea of oceans and endless awe, lashes beats and evens.

Humming drones flow out to work on canvas neatly wrought,

Craftsman ponder natures glory, of bees sweet life in the garden court.

Flowers burst with loving life, gardeners are brought to their knees,

Thrumming fingers in tender soil, a constant sound of glee.

The wispy day unfolds and heat murmurs against the hedge,

Lashings of sunshine, transposed to heat, beat and grasp and sledge.

The morning wains the shadows fade and storm clouds gather again,

Dusk falls silently as the prowler, waiting for its prey.

A twinkling star pokes, the crimson, tired sky,

The night spins a yarn of deep regret and rumbling shudders by.

Thrashing droves of endless rain, pierce the fickled window pane,

When will this endless nightmare, recede?

No one knows, yet the nightmare spindles on.

A scream is heard, a stirring bird all within my mind,

The sun suddenly reveals its face,

Undying and Unrefined.

Caressed by the break of day again, the cycle plods unhindered,

Spring recedes to summer and long days press the seed.

A man stands by an old oak tree wondering at the breeze,

Of early summer mornings, comfort filled, serene.

Breaking a blossom so tenderly the man stares off content,

The storm clouds wither instantly, leaving, gone and went.

The smiling man sighs a sigh and bathes with natures scorn,

Some things in life will never compare to the simple sight of morn.

‘Ode To The Night’

By T.W. Humphries

A broken portrait shifts within the dusky sky,

The furrow and the rustle whistles then asks ‘Why?’.

Beads of light flicker, in and out and in,

The falling, fading, mixing night kindly settles in.

The dry old moon shimmers with a carefree smile,

Stars twinkle in its wake with such tender style.

The leaves of beaten jasmines float upon the night,

Shaken madly by demons of sin, plucking them in the half light.

The howling wind batters in bruising all who pause,

Smashing those without the strength to abide with common laws.

Yet beyond the many slums there are men of stately thought,

Pausing at their windows comfort filled and taught.

The smiling moon’s playful address shudders, then switches key,

Lingering faces in wind smashed streets, prompt all within to flee.

Then to the clashing harbour from which the seaman stir.

The vengeful wrath of ‘Howling’, forcing in the blur.

But alas the clock strikes “12″ and the distant gong chimes forth,

The rustling howl of wind struck lanes and murmuring seasons of thought.

The night drags on unhindered and jabbing braches prove,

That ghosts really do walk the night, and moan and blatt and move.

A distant scream, the lovers gleam, all within the dark.

A silent garden wonders, as a sparrow begins to spark.

The groaning of a night, so dark, grotesque, and jaded.

Reminds the stately class of old, of vulgarity shattered, yet shaded.

The ghastly dark of night, stabs at those lingering hollow faces.

Beaten by darkness and cursed by light, the reality of their lives.

The garden again stirs quietly, a speck begins to rise.

The swelling form of daylight, quells this dismal guise.

Ode to the Night of pity whose winds die and moan alike,

Those men of old both rich and poor now ponder at the sky.

‘Portrait’

By T.W. Humphries

Note: This poem is my omage to Oscar Wilde’s work “The Picture of Dorian Gray”. It must be noted that at the time this work was written, I was naive as to the full contextual meaning of Wilde’s story.

I stand at the doorway of time and gaze upon a portrait,

Sweet with the scent of summer and its joy.

I behold the reflection which is my life,

Who knows of my inner self but me.

And perhaps the few shallow friends which share my days.

They know me not, yet the portrait reveals me,

The sun streams in, lighting a sparkle in my eyes.

The beauty of youth radiates throughout,

Yet as the willow blossoms in the summer,

So too must it wither at the call of autumn.

Watching I see the portrait smirk back at me,

The winds of the hourglass have battered me.

Yet within the grand canvas lays a life untouched by time,

Unpierced by the chorus of the centuries and the experiences therein.

Stealing a glance at the noon day sun I wonder,

The city sways and the breeze softens my face.

This portrait remains youthful, yet change corrupts me,

The noon day recedes and the shadows of afternoon set in.

Soon the youth of this face will be mocked by the frivolous dark of night.

The shallow moon rises to survey its subject people,

For in doing so a strange light touches the portrait and for a moment, it is alive.

I wait, my heart pounding upon my chest, the past returns to my vision.

A stab of candlelight sways my attention and it is now fixed on the canvas,

Shocked at first the portrait again stares ominously and I wonder upon its refinement.

Looking back over a canon of time, I realise that life is cruel,

And yet I behold an image untouched, unblemished by the cruel ravage of time.

Shuddering I realise my naivety at a time when I thought I was invincible,

Another moment passes and my heart settles to a thump and then another.

OH, what great service did this portrait do anyway?, Was it art or was it self indulgence?

Or was it merely a moment of life, where purity was everything my face portrayed.

Shivering, I ponder the sweeping curtains as they quiver in the chill of night,

Closing my studio doors, I stare out into the open blanket of space, pondering my true fate.

Watching a streaking star plummet to mother earth I realise,

There is more to Life, then obsessing over an obscure, portrait.

‘This Is Your Life’
By T.W Humphries
Shards of light dart in and out,
Shimmering coils of energy flow and suck.
A heaving sensation fills the air,
As sunlight plays aimlessly there.
At the point of no return,
The event horizon from bow to stern.
The emerging light is gaining strength,
Thwack, pop, WAA WAA WAA WAA!,
This is you, a new life.
You entered this world naked and cold,
And so you will return at your journey’s end,
To a sleep beyond this mortal world,
This is Your Life.
At the point of your birth,
You begin that decay.
A slow and painful process known as death.
You might be healthy, but your biological clock is ticking.
And so you grow and learn,
Of summer days and winter nights.
Of playgrounds, bullies, teachers and University exams,
All of which seem so sudden.
At the blink of an eye you reach working age,
You vote for your inclinations sake,
And pay for what the politicians take.
But who really cares,
This is Your life.
You marry and have beautiful children.
Expensive as it may seem,
The cycle has repeated itself,
For this is your life.
Your children grow up and move away,
Your left alone for another day,
To contemplate life and if its yours.
Surely you had a life?
You collect your dues and retire in peace,
And enjoy your grandchildren and their mischief,
Then you remember being their age.
Life’s vicious cycle plods precariously on,
You wonder with your short time left,
What things you have left undone or unsaid,
What things would have made a difference.
Experiences, memories, recollections,
Sensations if you will of another time and another place.
But what you have is your life.
You grip onto life with everything left,
And wonder who will go next.
For your friends are disappearing one by one.
Surely your time is almost come.
To lay down peacefully and call it a day,
And allow life to go on its way.
Your fading memory slips,
Your eyes fail and hearing recedes,
Your faculties desist to exist.
A faltering breath and you are gone,
This was your life.
Many attend your funeral,
Mourners from all walks of life,
Whom you know and whom were influenced by your personality.
You are remembered for who you were,
Laughs are exchanged and a reflection is noted,
You were special, someone complete.
But as time passes idle by,
No one passes to pay respects.
Except a grounds keeper who occasionally lays a rose,
At your families request.
You have faded into obscurity,
And everyone forgets,
That you held meaning and much respect.
The cemetery is paused in contemplation.
For all life is fragile, like the rose.
It can bloom to beauty and wither just as fast.
Hold on to everything you have,
Because, one day you won’t have it any more.
‘Crossroads’
By T.W Humphries
Here I stand at a crossroads,
My childhood far behind me,
Maturity & reality set in.
I am a young open mind,
Thirsting for experience rich and true.
I long for peace yet still my soul rages.
Unsure of whats behind and whats ahead.
The roadsigns of life seem to jump out and catch me unaware,
I am vunerable, idealistic, a dreamer and a thinker.
My thoughts and instincts guide me.
I wander aimlessly, drinking in all of lifes wonders.
Yet still what will I do?
My frustration bubbles wildly,
I am untamed, raw and ambitious.
Yet my dreams are crushed by the world,
The world is a harm-filled, cruel place,
Where am I going in this brutal world?
Must I travel this journey alone?
Do I have a destiny?
Where will I find a bountiful source of wisdom?
If I am successful, who will I share my life with?
So many questions, so few answers,
Yet I realise at this crossroad,
That the answers I seek will come, as I go.
Thus the journey will never end.
‘Silence’
By TW Humphries
An imposing theatre stands tall,
Crowds gather at the door in a throng.
The fading shadows recede and a newly formed family waits.
The mother is a composer and the father a conductor.
Music is their life, they eat and breath it.
Their joy for their baby son is overflowing,
For it is their first chance to introduce him to music.
The passion of the symphony,
An experience he could have on any instrument.
Whether loud or silent,
Soprano or Bass.
The father dreams of educating his son,
And giving him the opportunity to go to the best university.
So that he would one day himself take up the baton.
In scanning the swelling crowd the boy’s mother also dreams.
She dreams of introducing him to the piano,
And the church choir,
All something that would instil in him their love.
The crowds filled into the magnificent auditorium, expectation rose.
Culture escaped the rambling’s of those in box seats,
In silence all eyes centred on the awaited moment.
With baited breath, the conductor strolled out,
He bowed at the applause and settled into his score.
The musicians readied themselves,
A moment of sheer stillness filled the room.
The conductor paused,
And launched into a passionate display.
Beethoven’s “Allegro ma non troppo” filled the air,
People whispered over the rising sound.
And the young couple relished every moment.
Every beat satisfied their desire.
This first moment of music for their son,
What magnificence he would enjoy.
Years passed and the boy grew,
His love of music took shape.
He learnt theory and embarked on the journey,
Sound to him was such a natural thing.
Passion revealed itself as the brilliant actor does,
And he ambitiously set himself goals.
As the years further transpired he learnt more.
Silently one day his mother dabbled at the volume control and Beethoven’s Symphony boomed,
Her son was going about his chores.
He did not seem to register the sound,
Curious her mother called to him.
He did not respond, Until he faced her.
He was deaf, He had managed to lip read,
Shock reverberated throughout her soul.
Relaying this news would crush her husband.
With tears streaking down her silent face, she rang her husband.
He picked up her apprehension and inquired lovingly.
She wailed out the facts she had discovered.
This moment crushed the husband’s heart,
Considering his progress, they agreed not to let it affect them, yet somehow it did.
However the son continued on in his passion, of the tender sounds of the piano.
Never to know the feeling of music,
A leaf fell outside his window and he continued on in silence.

‘Conversations’
By T.W Humphries
The grinding steel of a hulky train jolts forward,
The fence line whips past in a frenzy.
A fading sun meshes with the open horizon.
I am on a train,
It is peak hour.
The thrumming sound of the train drones in my ears,
Cluttering conversations rattle through the halls.
The distinguished gentlemen of the public service.
The intrigue of the supermarket magazine,
The turmoil of the world swirls,
Within a paper.
Everything in it spins before my eyes.
A young family sits content,
A mother, a father a beautiful baby.
A wonderful scene.
Yet, a stark contrast to what is outside.
Students scatter about the train,
Debating openly.
Politics, Religion, Sex, nothing is left unsaid.
A lady stands out from the rest,
Very much the conversationalist.
The beaming crimson of late afternoon strikes her face.
Beauty beyond anything I can or ever will imagine.
My heart races for a moment and the train jolts me out of my quiet thoughts.
She’s too classy for me,
With her brilliant career, computer and friends.
If the comparison were made, she is a goddess,
And I am a boy, wishing to be a man.
Then my eyes turn to another lady,
My age, sitting straight, reading a novel.
Deeply intrigued, her glasses slide and she slips them up again.
She is nothing incredible to look at,
Yet, surely she is a success,
Not boastful, but unassuming and ready to strike when everyone is unprepared.

‘That Brash Boy’
By T.W. Humphries
There he stood in the driving rain,
Dancing to victory and at the same time laughing at his adversaries.
He had risen to the summit,
He had realised his dream in that moment.
That Brash boy, soaked to the bone,
Drank in a freedom lovers victory that had been a long time coming.
This brash boy had been the weakling,
The one who was targeted.
But on that fate-filled sporting field he unleashed a power,
A power he never knew he had, a power unknown to everyone.
He stamped it hard on his enemy and crushed his exploding superiority.
Here stood a brash boy, content to admit he had risen to the occasion,
Victory was finally his!
Oblivion
by T.W Humphries
The words simply read,
An eternal void enshrouds me.
Such a woeful and depressing sense,
Sharp sensations jab my enthusiasm,
And drain my passion for life.
Blankness is life now,
Dark and unending,
Blankness a veil, shoves me,
And tells me what to do.
There must be light at the end of the tunnel,
What am I supposed to do?
Thoughts of political death blanket me again,
A comforting thought to me.
I want to rebel,
Yet responsibility presses hard.
The unknown is the blankness,
Jarring and depressingly hard.
I’d rather be politically dead now,
True blackness this would be.
An escape into oblivion, oh yes this is for me.
I ponder escape then wonder,
What really should I do?
Blankness and darkness are everywhere,
Inside and outside too.
I want to feel content and happy.
Please have mercy on me Oh God!
And allow me to pass quietly,
Into quiet, loving political blackness.
My name is precious Barnaby,
And I am a member of the National Party.

‘War’

By T.W. Humphries

Death at war is like a predator,

stalking its prey like a fine sniper.

Who would have thought political blood was as bad,

as an old drunken tramp raggedly clad.

These boys and girls coming home were far to young,

Sorry to late they’ve already been stung.

Wars heroine “Julie” walks up and down,

Like an old beaten jeep, shot up and round.

A cold heartless mist slowly lifts up,

And a general named Malcolm screams desperately, after getting shot.

When the war finally ends at Xmas everyone will go home,

To worry filled lives, all of their own.

War is like sausage making, something no one should see,

So don’t get excited, war isn’t glee.

‘Heart Of Greed’

By T.W. Humphries

A radiant mist surfaces against the shadowy landscape,

Sunlight slaps behind the veiled horizon,

And proclaims the fall of night.

The day has lost the battle and the heart of night has fallen heavy.

Strange, mystical sounds murmur with the crystal sky,

The heart of greed is unleashed.

The heart of greed is a frightening thing,

Brings a child to sobs and a man to his knees.

What dark force, stirs in this great abyss.

The crack of a howling wolf rings clear in the night,

The fullness of the moon reveals its glory and shines down in all it’s might.

Greed who are you?

Do you sit high and mighty or low and powerless?

Is your domain the darkness or the light?

Is your life petty and full of spite?,

Or is the truth your redeeming feature.

You possess a man’s soul and tantalise his spirit.

Acquisition is your lure and fame is your sinker.

The Heart Of Greed makes a man take to the armour and the sword in defence,

Of an estate in ill-gotten gains, putrid yet content.

Honour and glory are nothing in the sight of greed.

Hearts are shredded and families torn,

Yet still the joy of greed burns.

The stinging desire for more, perverts and smears the truth in pathetic lies.

Men yet fall heavy with the night,

And ponder what could have been won.

A streak of lightening flashes against the black sky,

A mansion towers into the night,

A man emerges, rubs his eyes and dreams of more.

Yet he coughs, the sound of a dying vulture,

And still he ponders for more.


Atlas Essay

October 5, 2009
Atlas Shrugged Essay
Presented By T.W. Humphries
In Atlas Shrugged, reference is made to a “Morality of Death.” What is the nature of this morality? What role does it play in the story? Why does it gain the label that it does in the novel? Explain.
Socrates is best known for two words: “Know thyself”. In life as in death this presents the ultimate philisophical challenge to both the professional and layman thinker. This essay will address the issue of the “Morality of Death”, the nature of this morality, the role it plays in the Atlas Shrugged and conclude in explanation with why the morality of death issue gains the label it does in the novel.
The personal philosophy of an individual can be divined by asking and answering whether he a destroyer or liberator in the Atlas Shrugged context. It is ironic that despite the validity of such a question its truth is not more widely expressed or debated in the mainstream public culture. Perhaps a symptom of this lies in the fact that Death and the Nihilistic philosophy it entails is the prevailing philosophy of the modern culture. The emblematic nature of Death as moral or immoral is at the heart of the truth, justice and libertarian values that define the United States of America as the great example of these values.
In the past 5 years I have moved from the beginnings of education to the final year of undergraduate college education. I have experienced much of collectivism and self-interest, read deeply on social, economic, technical, political issues and in this search, I still come to conclude that the individual will define the morality of one’s life as well as the ultimate definition of this morality in death.
Ayn Rand’s heroic overview of “morality” as enshrined in Atlas Shrugged is a philosophy where each of the major and minor characters lives his life within the context of values inherent in that individual. The interplay of individual characters through out the story, coupled with the characterizations of heroic and destructive values is key to fully understanding the morality or immorality of death.
The answer of who is John Galt defines the nature of the morality of life and the values inherent in death within the individual spirit and work of the man. His character reflects his own wish to be left to live and work for the true benefit of his own life and to bring the world to a stop if he so chooses through the application of that work. The positive morality of Death therefore would be the individual’s right to defend one’s life and work in a self interested manner, to if need be defend the moral, rational and conscious choice of living for the self, being a means to an end to benefit the interest of the self.
The morality of Death as in life is the ability to take any path of ones choosing to the point of death so long as it is consistent with that view of living as a means to an end for the self interest of the individual. The ultimate drive of life is the inherent passion one has to survive and be creative and productive in defining ones existence within the context of self interest and the role this plays in one’s life work.
Too often the premise on the Morality of Death that Atlas Shrugged speaks about is defiled, mocked and destroyed by a society bent upon the aim of subjugating the interest of the individual by destroying individualistic values and victimization of those who so choose to defend that individual and self interested end.
Why would a great steel industrialist work for his own destruction? Why would a composer give up his career on the night of his greatest triumph? Why must a beautiful woman running a transcontinental railroad fall in love with the man she has vehemently sworn to kill?
The aforementioned questions are the ultimate metaphysical and philosophical quandary to the uneducated. Those who blindly ask why the individual would of their own choosing do such a thing? The endemic value of a society based upon the negativist view of death would ask why the individual would defiantly rage against the expectations of a collective society for its own good, when clearly the parasitic expectations of that “public good” would clearly be best served by the subjugation of the individual to the philosophy and action of the collective good. Thus denouncing the individual and forcing that individual to become subsumed by the societal interest, sacrificing this to the expectations of the invisible hand of a society not defined by rational self-interest but by the destructive premise of altruism.
It is John Galt’s right to live his life as he saw fit within the context of his own rational set of values and creative work. It is Hank Rearden’s right to live his life as he sees fit, to define his moral standards by his own work and life. It is Dagny Taggart’s right to live, love and work to the achievement of her own rational self-interest. This is not to define the individuals right within the context of altruistic values or regulations. This is to define self-interest in the context of the individual as portrayed by Atlas Shrugged as the greatest expression of that individual’s ability in the natural and inspired sense.
No one individual can or must define for another what course they will or will not take. The ability to live, love and work must not be defined by societies collective invisible hand. To study and not fully understand the ideals acted out by Atlas Shrugged is to entirely miss the literary premise from which it was created.
The nature and role of the morality of death is clearly defined by the values enshrined in the story. A punitive society bent on the destruction of mankind for the sake of altruism and removal of the individuals of rational self-interest who themselves stand against altruistic values is the crux of the story and the philosophical definition of the morality of death. The individual therefore defines the morality of death by the values and traits reflected in that individuals core philosophy and through the actions of that individual within the broader world to either rational self-interest of destructive altruism.
The Morality of Death gains this label through the novel because of and as a consequence of the philosophical premises upon which each individual lives out their life. Whether this morality is defined by rational self-interest or by destructive forces of collective altruism is purely for the individual to decide. To consciously destroy in the name of altruism is the negative morality of death. To consciously destroy to defend the rational principle of individual self-interest is a clear example of the morality of death. What form this defence takes and how it is enacted will be for the individual to decide. For as Socrates said to “Know thyself” is to understand the philosophical premises upon which the individual will operate both in the morality of life and the morality of death.By T.W. Humphries

By T.W. Humphries

In Atlas Shrugged, reference is made to a “Morality of Death.” What is the nature of this morality? What role does it play in the story? Why does it gain the label that it does in the novel? Explain.

Socrates is best known for two words: “Know thyself”. In life as in death this presents the ultimate philisophical challenge to both the professional and layman thinker.

This essay will address the issue of the “Morality of Death”, the nature of this morality, the role it plays in the Atlas Shrugged and conclude in explanation with why the morality of death issue gains the label it does in the novel.

The personal philosophy of an individual can be divined by asking and answering whether he a destroyer or liberator in the Atlas Shrugged context.

It is ironic that despite the validity of such a question its truth is not more widely expressed or debated in the mainstream public culture.

Perhaps a symptom of this lies in the fact that Death and the Nihilistic philosophy it entails is the prevailing philosophy of the modern culture.

The emblematic nature of Death as moral or immoral is at the heart of the truth, justice and Libertarian values that define the United States of America as the great example of these values.

In the past 5 years I have moved from the beginnings of education to the final year of undergraduate college education.

I have experienced much of collectivism and self-interest, read deeply on social, economic, technical, political issues and in this search, I still come to conclude that the individual will define the morality of one’s life as well as the ultimate definition of this morality in death.

Ayn Rand’s heroic overview of “morality” as enshrined in Atlas Shrugged is a philosophy where each of the major and minor characters lives his life within the context of values inherent in that individual.

The interplay of individual characters through out the story, coupled with the characterizations of heroic and destructive values is key to fully understanding the morality or immorality of death.

The answer of who is John Galt defines the nature of the morality of life and the values inherent in death within the individual spirit and work of the man.

His character reflects his own wish to be left to live and work for the true benefit of his own life and to bring the world to a stop if he so chooses through the application or non-application of that work.

The positive morality of Death therefore would be the individual’s right to defend one’s life and work in a self interested manner, to if need be defend the moral, rational and conscious choice of living for the self, being a means to an end to benefit the interest of the self.

The morality of Death as in life is the ability to take any path of ones choosing to the point of death so long as it is consistent with that view of living as a means to an end for the self interest of the individual.

The ultimate drive of life is the inherent passion one has to survive and be creative and productive in defining ones existence within the context of self interest and the role this plays in one’s life.

Too often the premise on the Morality of Death that Atlas Shrugged speaks about is defiled, mocked and destroyed by a society bent upon the aim of subjugating the interest of the individual by destroying individualistic values and victimization of those who so choose to defend that individualist end.

Why would a great steel industrialist work for his own destruction? Why would a composer give up his career on the night of his greatest triumph? Why must a beautiful woman running a transcontinental railroad fall in love with the man she has vehemently sworn to kill?

The aforementioned questions are the ultimate metaphysical and philosophical quandary to the uneducated.

Those who blindly ask why the individual would of their own choosing do such a thing?

The endemic value of a society based upon the negativist view of death would ask why the individual would defiantly rage against the expectations of a collective society for its own good, when clearly the parasitic expectations of that “public good” would clearly be best served by the subjugation of the individual to the philosophy and action of the collective good.

Thus, denouncing the individual and forcing that individual to become subsumed by the societal interest, sacrificing this to the expectations of the invisible hand of a society not defined by rational self-interest but by the destructive premise of altruism.

It is John Galt’s right to live his life as he saw fit within the context of his own rational set of values and creative work.

It is Hank Rearden’s right to live his life as he sees fit, to define his moral standards by his own work and life.

It is Dagny Taggart’s right to live, love and work to the achievement of her own rational self-interest.

This is not to define the individuals right within the context of altruistic values or regulations.

This is to define self-interest in the context of the individual as portrayed by Atlas Shrugged as the greatest expression of that individual’s ability in the natural and inspired sense.

No one individual can or must define for another what course they will or will not take.

The ability to live, love and work must not be defined by societies collective invisible hand. To study and not fully understand the ideals acted out by Atlas Shrugged is to entirely miss the literary premise from which it was created.

The nature and role of the morality of death is clearly defined by the values enshrined in the story. A punitive society bent on the destruction of mankind for the sake of altruism and removal of the individuals of rational self-interest who themselves stand against altruistic values is the crux of the story and the philosophical definition of the morality of death. The individual therefore defines the morality of death by the values and traits reflected in that individuals core philosophy and through the actions of that individual within the broader world to either rational self-interest of destructive altruism.

The Morality of Death gains this label through the novel because of and as a consequence of the philosophical premises upon which each individual lives out their life. Whether this morality is defined by rational self-interest or by destructive forces of collective altruism is purely for the individual to decide. To consciously destroy in the name of altruism is the negative morality of death. To consciously destroy to defend the rational principle of individual self-interest is a clear example of the morality of death. What form this defence takes and how it is enacted will be for the individual to decide. For as Socrates said to “Know thyself” is to understand the philosophical premises upon which the individual will operate both in the morality of life and the morality of death.


Pharaohs and High Priests

September 18, 2009

A repost email from a friend of mine Nathan Minchev well worth a read:

“The pharaoh collected a large amount of taxes that he used for large government projects such as building pyramids and temples. These taxes also supported the wages of skilled workers, scribes, artisans, and military personnel, as well as financing large projects done by peasants during times of flood.”

History Link

Sound familiar?

The ancient Egyptians were quite fond of a bit of slavery too.

You know slavery, it’s where you work and work and work for someone else but you don’t get to enjoy the fruits of your labour.

Well, if Pharaohs Kevin Rudd and Ken Henry have their way with the upcoming tax stitch-up, chances are you’ll be pushed even further into servitude.

Already, the average Australian worker (that’s right, the average) has more than 20% of his or her salary confiscated by the government before it even hits their bank account.

That’s just the beginning. Think about it this way though. If you work a five-day week, every Monday, the work you do is to pay off the Federal government’s income tax demand.

Come Tuesday and you have to work half the day to pay off your superannuation guarantee. That’s money which is guaranteed to be taken from you, but without any guarantee you’ll get it back.

The rest of Tuesday and into Wednesday is taken up with paying off the GST and other levies and surcharges you find yourself paying for every day.

By the time you get to the close of business on Wednesday you should have paid off a raft of other taxes, such as rates, vehicle registration, medicare levy, medicare surcharge (or private healthcare), payroll tax, and don’t forget all the company taxes you ultimately pay for through higher prices for products and services.

So, as you roll into work on Thursday morning, it looks as though you’re about to earn some cash for yourself…

Not so fast bucko. If you’ve got a mortgage, chances are  that’s another 20-30% of your income going straight to banks, just to keep a roof over your head. Now, all that by my calculations brings us up to – about right now on a Friday morning.

That means you’ve got the rest of the day to work for yourself. But as if it couldn’t get much worse there’s one more hurdle for you – inflation.

By the time you finish work this week and get paid next week (if you’re lucky) or next month, the dollars that you worked 40 hours for will actually be worth less to you than the dollars you worked for last month. Your average salary of $62,000 at the start of the year, adjusted for inflation will only be worth about $60,000 by the end of the year.

You need a 3% pay rise just to get back to breakeven. Talk about running just to stand still.

So, at about the time of the two o’clock smoko this afternoon, the money you earn for the rest of the day is yours to earn and spend as you please.

But don’t worry, if that doesn’t sound like much, because you’ve always got the credit card to fall back on. Out of interest, the total purchases on credit cards in July by Australians was $19.1 billion.

Look, play around with those numbers as much as you like. Chances are I’m not far off the mark.

And what does the mainstream press have to say about any of this? Nothing of course. The best they can come up with is rubbish like, “Rudd helped you hang onto your job.”

No! No he didn’t. It was your money. You helped yourself hold on to your job.

That was the money you worked for which was confiscated by the government and then divvied out to its  favourite chums, are handed back as a bribe.

Rudd didn’t help anyone. Remember, if you were lucky enough to get the $900 bribe, it actually cost you around $4,200 from your taxes to fund the Fairy Ruddfather’s spending.

Only, you haven’t really paid for it yet, but you will. Because the government has just borrowed the money and will demand that you pay it back. Even though you’ve gotten nothing for it, and didn’t even ask to go into  debt.

But in reality, the Fairy Ruddfather is just one of the Pharaohs. His co-conspirator is the real danger man.

That’s Treasury Secretary, Ken Henry. Without exaggeration, this man is one of the biggest threats to the individual rights and freedoms of all Australians.

The man is a menace.

Maybe you think that’s a bit harsh. After all, he is a public servant. And people aren’t supposed to criticize public servants. Doubtless he would tell everyone he could be earning much more in the private sector but he’s forsaken that to “do his bit” for society.

Let me explain what I mean when I label this man as the biggest threat to individual rights and freedom…

Reading the story in yesterday’s Australian Financial Review (AFR), your editor was stunned by two things. The reporting of the story, and the content.

To quote from the article:

“Dr Henry has invited about 20 representatives of key business and tax groups to attend a meeting in Sydney on October 15 to give feedback on reform directions to him and panel colleagues Heather Ridout and Greg Smith.”

The article goes on to quote from the letter of invitation:

“This consultation session provides an opportunity for you to provide feedback on the refore directions that the review panel is considering. The views of stakeholders are important to the review panel in ensuring that the possible reforms take business circumstances into account and are sustainable.”

He’s also planning on meeting with other accounting lobby groups.

Anything ridiculous strike you about consulting accountants about tax proposals? It’s like asking a butcher if we should all become vegetarians. Tax groups are hardly likely to recommend abolishing taxes, or even making the tax code simpler.

It’s in their interest for it to be as complicated as possible.

But more than that, where’s our invitation? Where’s your invitation? I mean it’s you that contributes every dollar to tax revenue whether it’s direct or indirect.

Of course, you’ll be told “this is much too complicated to trouble you with. You just get along and concentrate on working, that’s a good citizen!”

It got us thinking. Have you ever watched someone talk to someone who’s disabled in a wheelchair? In many cases they’ll either talk to them slowly like a six year-old, as though loss of leg usage has someone affected their brain power, or they’ll completely ignore them and talk to the carer instead.

Well, reading that story in the AFR yesterday it seems like the pollies view the humble taxpayer as nothing more than a cripple in a wheelchair…

Just go to the Treasury website and take a look at the submissions. There’s thousands of them.

Special interest groups as far as the eye can see. Each backed by research and PhDs and tax experts by the dozen.

Granted, there are also many submissions from individuals. Self funded retirees scared out of their wits at the prospect of Pharaoh Rudd and Henry swiping their life savings outrights or by stealth.

Here’s a sample:

“I am writing to you about my growing concerns with the direction being taken by ‘Australian’s Future Tax System Review’ and the possible harmful impact on my retirement savings.”
Carol Anderson

“I am greatly concerned at reports that the Henry Tax Review is considering recommendations to remove or change the dividend imputation scheme.”
Jan Attwood

“I am shocked to hear that government is considering the abolition of dividend franking credits. At this time when elderly self-funded retirees such as ourselves, are having difficulties meeting costs with reduced dividends and low interest rates; to also lose franking credits, would drive many of us to having to rely on the pension, and to give up private health insurance.”
Jocelyn Banks

“I am concerned that the proposed possible changes will negatively affect dividend income I was planning to live on.”
Elizabeth Every

Those are just four individual submissions. Like most of those from individuals they barely make it onto a second page. And like most of them we can guarantee anything they have to say will be ignored.

Thankfully the Tax Review panel received submissions like the 55 pages from the likes of the Australian Bankers Association.

Or the Australian Social Inclusion Board which laments,  “Varied treatment of income, as well as exemptions, deductions and concessions available in the existing system provide opportunities for people to pay less than their share of tax.”

That would involve the government deciding what the “share of tax” would be we assume. Or maybe the Australian Social Inclusion Board could quantify what the “share” should be.

Then there’s the fund managers of course, AXA have chimed in with the unsurprising declaration that, “AXA believes that in order to achieve Australia’s desired objectives in relation to self funded retirement, an increase in the Superannuation Guarantee is required.”

And we shouldn’t forget the trade unions who will do all they can to ensure you don’t get to keep your hard earned wages:

“This Review is ideally placed to consider a series of taxation measures to ensure that the top income earners in our community, who benefited from neo liberalism over the last three decades (while their share of total income doubled) are those in the forefront of new progressive taxation policies.”

You’ve got to give the unions some credit. They may as well have quoted Wolfie Smith, “come the glorious revolution they’ll be the first against the wall!”

For ‘progressive taxation’ read, “give us what you’ve earned.”

It’s nothing more than theft of your property (income). Can we really believe that Pharaoh Henry will turn his back on the ‘progressive’ taxationists and declare taxation to be immoral?

Of course not. Pharaoh Henry has carte blanche re-form (that’s right re-form, not reform) the tax system. It will be a re-forming that ensures individual tax burdens are increased while special interest groups and lobby groups are thrown a few bones to keep them quiet.

Individuals will find a greater tax burden either directly or indirectly, and a destruction of their retirement savings.

Increased public spending and borrowing by the government in your name with the demand that you pay for is nothing short of coercive rule by a bunch of megalomaniacal bunch of bureaucrats.

We’ll wait to see what Pharaoh Henry has to say when his report is published, but we can guarantee you’re not going to like it.


Pithy post of the Week – A Swannie Special

September 9, 2009

I can imagine Swannie having a Jerry Mcguire moment or three in the lead up to next years election, but can you heh.


Pithy Post of the Week

August 30, 2009

If Jamaica can have a bobsled team, Why can’t Queensland have a Liberal Government led by a Liberal?


“Talking Isn’t acting” A Climate Apathist’s view

August 27, 2009

September 1939. Hitler saddled up and took Poland with the strategic
skillfulness of the reprehesenbily insane.

The defining moment of the 20th Century. World War II that great collective historical marker.

That moral analogy that those of us who profess freedom love to tout.
The question remains though was The 19th and 20th Century really an
era of freedom?

It can be argued that economics, politics and reality collided in a
cacophony of strange co-incidences leading to the inevitability of
Hitler’s rise.

I often think about the historical record regarding Hitler and wonder
what would have happened if by some chance, he had of been prevented from rising to power. Would he have, if circumstances were different, remained in his lower-middle class surroundings as an artisan or worker in the local factories. Rather than galvanizing the largest and most well remembered force of totalitarian evil in modern history?
It’s a question that often plagues my mind, as I reflect on people
like Heinrich Himmler, Goebbels and the various other politically
motivated cronies that surrounded Hitler in his time in power. It is
obvious that if it wasn’t Hitler it probably would have been one of
the other Social Darwinians. After all destruction still begets,
destruction.

What strikes me most compellingly is the fact that the history of this
period, particularly the American film version of it was written from
the perspective of the American idea of winners and losers.

Certainly there was clearly a winner and loser, but the moral dynamic that this brings into play is one reminiscent of the 1950’s and 60’s television shows revolving around Cowboys and Indians.

The Allies task as the narrative goes was to kick the Nazi’s world domination ambition off the map and they did so with mountainous success.

What is interesting to me despite this narrative discussion is the
period leading up to World War II and the role that the pacifists and
appeasers played on both sides of the moral equation. How is it that
attempts at appeasement behind closed doors were allowed to go on at all?

With a clear and present danger as presented by Hitler, the
nationalist overtones of his Napoleonic style and overbearing lust for
control of Europe and the globe, surely demanded a freedom backed
pre-emptive strike!

And yet it didn’t happen that way because the good guys were too scared to face the reality at the beginning of the story!

History and certainly the 20th Century Europe that we remember today, would have been much different, if Churchill, had of galvanized with the Allies behind a pre-emptive strike in the vein of the most recent European and Gulf War’s.

How is it that human nature always tries to see the best in people
even when clear evidence proves the opposite?

Think of the creative, literary and scientific achievement that was lost to history as a result of the myopic views of one man. What great knowledge and medical breakthrough’s could have been discovered, if Jew, Gentile, Aryan and Arab races had of worked together to the greater benefit of all man-kind, rather than being pitted against each other in a fictional narrative that bore itself out in a destructive and
disastrous truth.

There have been many books written about the Holocaust, the French
Resistance and of cause the overall record regarding the Eastern and
Western Front and the role that America played as a reluctant late
entrant into the battle for freedom that World War II later embodied.

I would contend that a new Totalitarianism is beginning to raise it’s
ugly head. It’s not Climate belief or climate denial but Climate
apathy.

Every opinion poll I have seen in the last few years, has
pointed directly and incontrovertibly to a view that says, that the
public are thirsting for action on Climate Change.

Whether you call it Climate Change, Global Warming or you don’t
believe in it at all, reducing the levels of pollution in the
atmosphere and doing so in a sustainable and measured way has to be a positive thing.

The question then turns into what construct of extremism do you adhere to?

Do you want to take the Green path of 40-50 percent cuts and return to the horse and buggy vision of the late 19th and Early 20th Century, or do you want to ignore the whole thing and go on as if there is nothing going on at all.

As a representative of Generation Y, I can clearly see that my
generation is getting tired of the silly games being played by some
politicians, academics and quasi-futurist intellectuals, oriented
towards hangers on status, who really only care about what they can
get out of the debate.

The natural inclination of politicians is to carefully read this
public mood, and try to march out in front of public opinion in the
style of an Austin Power’s type march.

With twirlers twirling and music blaring, It’s this kind of march that looks entertaining and action packed, but on climate change we haven’t yet seen the real action begin.

This is why I’m neither a climate believer or denier. I’m a free
market oriented Climate Apathist. I’m inclined to an apathist view
because I’m sick of hearing people talking about the need to do or not
do something, when nothing is really being done in the process of
talking about trying to do something!

Saying action can be taken is not the same as acting. How can
anyone hold high hopes for the outcome of Copenhagen or any other agreement for Australia, when Australia probably won’t even have agreement on their own domestic approach to this issue by the end of this year.

People like Senator Barnaby Joyce who have consistently framed and
described the Climate debate in the context of eco-totalitarianism,
need a solid and pre-emptive political upper cut. It’s time to look
past this unctuous paradigm of belief and denial and actually act!

All options have to be on the table, whether they be obstructionist
avoidance as he argues, extreme and deep cuts as the
greens argue or a middle path of gradual technological change over the next decade that will herald the march of progress.

Creating the capitalist driven economic certainty for future growth
that all freedom oriented apathist’s like me crave must be achieved
using a freemarket oriented “Climate Third Way”.

Yes it’s true, I maybe apathetic and cynical in a way, but deep down
I’m longing to see substantive, tangible technological development
beyond our current situation that will change the game completely and begin driving a new future.

Unfortunately, I haven’t seen it yet. Perhaps its time for me to step
up to the plate as a technologically savvy Generation Y’er and show
the leaders how to lead.

Either way, to actually take action maybe tougher than first thought,
after all as I have repeatedly said “talking isn’t acting” as has been
demonstrated.

It’s ultimately a question that boils down to whether you accept or
deny the truth of a contentious issue. Or are you apathetic about
whether real action could be achieved even with India, China,
Australia and the United States on board.

With the clear and present danger that not acting presents, the real
danger is appeasing the deniers, coddling the believers and ignoring
those of us who’d like to see change but are generally apathetic as to
how it could be achieved without descent into a new kind of
economic totalitarianism.

Tim Humphries is a Systems Analyst and Student currently writing a
climate change based Internet solution from Brisbane, Australia.
Interested Capitalist benefactors can contact him at
mothyspace@gmail.com